ATP2555 II (talk | contribs) (→Walkers: Corrected caps.) |
ATP2555 II (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Walkers== |
==Walkers== |
||
| − | Why are there T-39 Bogatyr walkers being developed when the info for |
+ | Why are there T-39 Bogatyr walkers being developed when the info for the L5 Riesig walker in 2142 said that it was developed from the T1 walker? Shouldn't they be T1 walkers instead? [[User:ATP2555 II|ATP2555 II]] ([[User talk:ATP2555 II|talk]]) 19:20, October 30, 2014 (UTC) |
:I was kind of just assuming that they were Bogatyrs since I overlooked the bit about the T1, but you have a really good point. The blueprints on the map just name it "Walker" which doesn't help anything, so it's probably safe to assume they're T1s. I'll update the article, thanks for bringing it up! -{{Signatures/Apprentice125}}23:11, October 30, 2014 (UTC) |
:I was kind of just assuming that they were Bogatyrs since I overlooked the bit about the T1, but you have a really good point. The blueprints on the map just name it "Walker" which doesn't help anything, so it's probably safe to assume they're T1s. I'll update the article, thanks for bringing it up! -{{Signatures/Apprentice125}}23:11, October 30, 2014 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 15:19, 31 October 2014
Walkers
Why are there T-39 Bogatyr walkers being developed when the info for the L5 Riesig walker in 2142 said that it was developed from the T1 walker? Shouldn't they be T1 walkers instead? ATP2555 II (talk) 19:20, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
- I was kind of just assuming that they were Bogatyrs since I overlooked the bit about the T1, but you have a really good point. The blueprints on the map just name it "Walker" which doesn't help anything, so it's probably safe to assume they're T1s. I'll update the article, thanks for bringing it up! -
Apprentice125(Talk)23:11, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
